Proof Portal

Projects

jsonparser

ProbeLabs23 findings · 123 requirements

The fastest JSON parser for Go — formally verified with ReqProof (real library, master).

All requirements
RequirementSYS-REQ-001SystemApproved

When the JSON input is well formed, a key path is provided, and the addressed path exists, the parser shall return the addressed value slice, the corresponding value type classification, the end offset of that value, and no error.

All automated checks pass and 1/1 obligations are satisfied. Reviewed 4 weeks ago.
PriorityshallTypeguaranteeCategoryfunctionalComponentparserAssuranceBFindingsnone open

Specification

The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.

Description

When the JSON input is well formed, a key path is provided, and the addressed path exists, the parser shall return the addressed value slice, the corresponding value type classification, the end offset of that value, and no error.

FRETish formula
the parser shall always satisfy !json_input_is_well_formed | !key_path_is_provided | !addressed_path_exists | returns_existing_path_lookup_result
View full formal model

Rationale & tags

Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.

The exported Get API is the fundamental primitive that all typed accessor helpers build on, so successful addressed lookup should be specified independently from not-found, empty-input, incomplete-input, no-key-path behavior, and lower-level path interpretation rules.

Verification & provenance

How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).

Assurance levelB
Formalizationvalid
Realizabilityrealizable
Vacuitychecked_ok
Strategyfretish

Review

Status
approved
Reviewer
Buger · lead_engineer
Reviewed
Jul 26, 2026, 15:21 UTC
Final re-approval after L3 strict posture sweep (hazard+obligation+coverage work)

History

Created
Apr 13, 2026, 16:22 UTC · Created via CLI
Modified
Jul 26, 2026, 15:21 UTC · Buger

Change history

Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.

Every recorded revision of this object's source — newest first, each with the commit message and its file-level diff.

Obligations

What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.

1 obligation · 1 discharged

Browse the catalogue
Discharged

Output identical regardless of collection ordering or runtime conditions.

If it were violatedMedium

Get on identical well-formed input returns a different (value,start,end) triple across calls; an offset-math layer downstream computes value[end-start:] past the buffer and slices out of range, panicking the caller.

Discharging evidence1/1 required witnessed
  • nominalrequiredpresent
    Covered by 1 test

Formula evidence

The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).

FRETish formula

the parser shall always satisfy !json_input_is_well_formed | !key_path_is_provided | !addressed_path_exists | returns_existing_path_lookup_result

Variables

NameTypeDirectionDescription
json_input_is_well_formedTrue when the provided JSON byte slice is well formed for the lookup case under evaluation.
key_path_is_providedTrue when the caller supplies at least one key-path segment for the lookup case under evaluation.
addressed_path_existsTrue when the requested key path resolves to a value in the JSON input under evaluation.
returns_existing_path_lookup_resultTrue when Get returns the addressed value, value type, end offset, and no error for a well-formed existing path lookup.

Witnesses· 6 scenarios total

  • TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_001_Row2_TriggerFalse
    exercises 1 condition scenario
  • TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_001_Row4_InvariantViolation
    exercises 1 condition scenario
  • TestGet
    exercises 4 condition scenarios

MC/DC truth table· 5 rows

Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.

Covereda test exercises this rowExempteda reviewed mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test
#addressed_path_existsjson_input_is_well_formedkey_path_is_providedreturns_existing_path_lookup_resultResultProvesCovering test
1FTTFTaddressed_path_exists
2TFTFTjson_input_is_well_formed
3TTFFTkey_path_is_provided
4TTTFFaddressed_path_exists
5TTTTTreturns_existing_path_lookup_result

Its place

This requirement shown inside its trace neighbourhood — the parents it satisfies, the code and tests attached to it, and its findings.

Loading graph…

Trace evidence

The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.

Impact

Blast radius — if you change this requirement, what else may need re-checking, and what it in turn depends on.

If you change this

Requirements
0
Files
3
Tests
12
At-risk contracts
0

Files to re-check (3)

  • fuzz.gofuzz.go
  • parser.goparser.go
  • path_compiler.gopath_compiler.go

Tests to re-run (12)

  • bytes_unsafe_test.gobytes_unsafe_test.go
  • dead_code_audit_test.godead_code_audit_test.go
  • fuzz_native_test.gofuzz_native_test.go
  • mcdc_code_supplement_test.gomcdc_code_supplement_test.go
  • mcdc_spec_witnesses_test.gomcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go
  • mcdc_supplement_test.gomcdc_supplement_test.go
  • obligation_evidence_test.goobligation_evidence_test.go
  • parser_error_test.goparser_error_test.go
  • parser_test.goparser_test.go
  • path_compiler_test.gopath_compiler_test.go
  • property_test.goproperty_test.go
  • reference_oracle_test.goreference_oracle_test.go

What this rests on

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in