Proof Portal
jsonparser
ProbeLabs36 findings · 123 requirementsarrayEachConfig empty-array sentinel checks for '}' instead of ']' — a valid `[]` is rejected as malformed
Medium-severity issue, currently open.
Introduced
When and where this issue first entered the codebase — the commit it traces back to.
Affected requirements
The requirement(s) this issue violates — click through to the spec.
What this means for you
Plain-language impact — what this issue could mean for your users and your system, before any of the technical detail.
Callers iterating arrays with ArrayEach get a spurious MalformedArrayError on the perfectly valid empty array `[]`, breaking otherwise-correct code paths that handle empty collections. Intentional demo defect on the proof-demo showcase branch; never shipped.
Reachable via ArrayEach/ArrayEachErr on any empty array value; every empty-array input is affected, so it surfaces immediately on valid data rather than needing a crafted payload.
Technical description
arrayEachConfig (parser.go) fast-paths an empty array by checking whether the first significant byte is the closing bracket. On the proof-demo showcase branch the sentinel was mutated from `if data[offset] == ']'` to `if data[offset] == '}'` (parser.go:1763), so a valid empty array `[]` no longer matches the empty-array sentinel; the loop then runs against the closing bracket and returns MalformedArrayError. This is a CWE-20 Improper Input Validation: well-formed input is rejected because the sentinel compares against the wrong delimiter. Intentional demo defect on the proof-demo showcase branch; never shipped.
Severity, explained
Why this is rated the way it is — and the scoring signals behind the rating (each ⓘ explains the term).
- why this rating
- Risk-rated
- risk area
- Correctness
- CVSS
- CVSS 5.3· Mediumv3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - CVE surface
- None
Where it is
The code the issue lives in — peek the affected function inline to see it in context.
- arrayEachConfig
How it's proven
The reproducer — an actual test that drives the real code and shows the issue happening. Run it yourself, or peek the test and the source it covers.
go test -run TestDemoKI10 -count=1 .
Reproduction steps
Technical steps for your engineers to confirm the issue by hand.
- Check out the proof-demo showcase branch and build the package.
- Call jsonparser.ArrayEach on the document `[]` — or run: go test -run TestDemoKI10 -count=1 .
- Observe MalformedArrayError instead of a clean zero-iteration success.
go test -run TestDemoKI10 -count=1 . go test ./... -count=1
How it can be triggered
The input or condition that sets this issue off.
a well-formed empty JSON array, []
What protects you, and the fix
What limits your exposure today, and the planned remediation.
What protects you now
Special-case/short-circuit empty arrays in caller code, or treat MalformedArrayError on known array fields as "empty", until the sentinel is corrected.
The fix
Restore the `']'` closing-bracket comparison in the empty-array fast path of arrayEachConfig (parser.go:1763, `data[offset] == '}'` -> `data[offset] == ']'`) so `[]` iterates zero times with a nil error. Closes CWE-20 Improper Input Validation.
Blast radius
If you touch this issue, what else may need re-checking — the requirements it affects and the code and tests that hang off them.
Touch this finding and you re-check 1 requirements · 2 code files · 3 tests.
- aliases.go
- parser.go
- mcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go
- obligation_evidence_test.go
- parser_test.go
Per-requirement evidence
For each requirement this finding touches: the implementing code, verifying tests, and proof obligations that discharge it.
Per-requirement evidence
For each requirement this finding touches: the implementing code, verifying tests, and proof obligations that discharge it.
Evidence trail
The raw evidence manifests behind this finding — superseded by the resolved reproducer above, kept here for traceability.
Evidence trail
The raw evidence manifests behind this finding — superseded by the resolved reproducer above, kept here for traceability.
- proof/evidence/KI-10-reproducer.yaml
Discussions
Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.