Proof Portal
jsonparser
ProbeLabs36 findings · 123 requirementsarrayEachConfig empty-input guard returns the wrong documented error type (MalformedJsonError vs MalformedObjectError)
Informational-severity issue, currently open.
Introduced
When and where this issue first entered the codebase — the commit it traces back to.
Affected requirements
The requirement(s) this issue violates — click through to the spec.
What this means for you
Plain-language impact — what this issue could mean for your users and your system, before any of the technical detail.
Code that switches on the specific error type returned by ArrayEach for empty input sees an inconsistent error value versus the documented contract and the arrayEachErr sibling — a cosmetic/robustness nit with no runtime risk. Intentional demo defect on the proof-demo showcase branch; never shipped.
Reachable only by calling ArrayEach with a zero-length input; purely a contract/error-type consistency nit with no security or availability impact.
Technical description
arrayEachConfig (parser.go) guards a zero-length input by returning an error before scanning. On the proof-demo showcase branch that empty-input return was changed from `MalformedObjectError` to `MalformedJsonError` (parser.go:1709), so ArrayEach on empty input surfaces an error type that disagrees with the documented contract and with the sibling arrayEachErr path. This is a CWE-20 Improper Input Validation nit — the failure is still reported, but with the wrong (inconsistent) error value. Purely informational: no security, availability, or data-integrity impact. Intentional demo defect on the proof-demo showcase branch; never shipped.
Severity, explained
Why this is rated the way it is — and the scoring signals behind the rating (each ⓘ explains the term).
- why this rating
- Risk-rated
- risk area
- Correctness
- CVE surface
- None
Where it is
The code the issue lives in — peek the affected function inline to see it in context.
- arrayEachConfig
How it's proven
The reproducer — an actual test that drives the real code and shows the issue happening. Run it yourself, or peek the test and the source it covers.
go test -run TestDemoKI12 -count=1 .
Reproduction steps
Technical steps for your engineers to confirm the issue by hand.
- Check out the proof-demo showcase branch and build the package.
- Call jsonparser.ArrayEach with an empty byte slice — or run: go test -run TestDemoKI12 -count=1 .
- Observe MalformedJsonError where the contract documents MalformedObjectError.
go test -run TestDemoKI12 -count=1 . go test ./... -count=1
How it can be triggered
The input or condition that sets this issue off.
an empty byte slice passed to ArrayEach (contract/robustness nit, no security impact)
What protects you, and the fix
What limits your exposure today, and the planned remediation.
What protects you now
Treat any non-nil error from ArrayEach on empty input as "no elements"; do not branch on the exact error type until the return is normalized.
The fix
Restore MalformedObjectError as the empty-input return of arrayEachConfig (parser.go:1709, `MalformedJsonError` -> `MalformedObjectError`) so the error type matches the documented contract and the arrayEachErr path. Consistency fix for CWE-20 Improper Input Validation.
Blast radius
If you touch this issue, what else may need re-checking — the requirements it affects and the code and tests that hang off them.
Touch this finding and you re-check 1 requirements · 2 code files · 3 tests.
- aliases.go
- parser.go
- mcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go
- obligation_evidence_test.go
- parser_test.go
Per-requirement evidence
For each requirement this finding touches: the implementing code, verifying tests, and proof obligations that discharge it.
Per-requirement evidence
For each requirement this finding touches: the implementing code, verifying tests, and proof obligations that discharge it.
Evidence trail
The raw evidence manifests behind this finding — superseded by the resolved reproducer above, kept here for traceability.
Evidence trail
The raw evidence manifests behind this finding — superseded by the resolved reproducer above, kept here for traceability.
- proof/evidence/KI-12-reproducer.yaml
Discussions
Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.