Proof Portal
jsonparser
ProbeLabs36 findings · 123 requirementsWhen Delete is called with a provided path, the addressed target is absent, and the input is otherwise usable for deletion, the parser shall return the original byte payload unchanged.
Specification
The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.
When Delete is called with a provided path, the addressed target is absent, and the input is otherwise usable for deletion, the parser shall return the original byte payload unchanged.
the parser shall always satisfy !delete_path_is_provided | delete_target_exists | delete_input_is_unusable_for_requested_path | delete_preserves_input_when_target_missing
Rationale & tags
Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.
Rationale & tags
Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.
Missing-target preservation is a distinct API outcome from successful deletion and from malformed-input robustness.
Verification & provenance
How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).
Review
- Status
- approved
- Reviewer
- human:leonidbugaev
- Reviewed
- Apr 23, 2026, 00:00 UTC
History
- Created
- Apr 14, 2026, 15:45 UTC · agent:codex
- Modified
- Jul 26, 2026, 14:54 UTC · human:cli
Obligations
What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.
2 obligations · 2 discharged
Browse the catalogueBehavior for unusual but valid input combinations.
Delete on an object whose only key is the absent target rewrites the payload (e.g. drops a sibling key in cleanup), silently corrupting the document.
- nominalrequiredpresentCovered by 1 test
Delete on a missing nested path descends into the intermediate structure and corrupts a sibling by deleting the wrong key, producing a wrong document.
- nominalrequiredpresentCovered by 1 test
Formula evidence
The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).
Formula evidence
The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).
FRETish formula
the parser shall always satisfy !delete_path_is_provided | delete_target_exists | delete_input_is_unusable_for_requested_path | delete_preserves_input_when_target_missing
Variables
| Name | Type | Direction | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| delete_path_is_provided | — | True when Delete is called with at least one path segment. | |
| delete_target_exists | — | True when the addressed Delete target exists and can be isolated in the input JSON. | |
| delete_input_is_unusable_for_requested_path | — | True when Delete cannot safely resolve the requested path because the input is malformed, truncated, or otherwise unusable for that deletion request. | |
| delete_preserves_input_when_target_missing | — | True when Delete leaves the input unchanged because the addressed target is missing in otherwise usable input. |
Witnesses· 5 scenarios total
- TestDeleteEmptyKeyPathComponentempty_key_path_test.go:214
- TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_034_Row1_TriggerFalsemcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go:1196exercises 1 condition scenario
- TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_034_Row2_InvariantViolationmcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go:1206exercises 1 condition scenario
- TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_034_Row3_TargetExistsUsablemcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go:1218exercises 1 condition scenario
- TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_034_Row4_UnusableInputmcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go:1228exercises 1 condition scenario
- TestObligation_SYS_REQ_034obligation_evidence_test.go:323
- TestDeleteparser_test.go:1350exercises 1 condition scenario
- TestPropertyDeleteIdempotentproperty_test.go:555
- TestOracleDeleteCorrectnessreference_oracle_test.go:703
Its place
This requirement shown inside its trace neighbourhood — the parents it satisfies, the code and tests attached to it, and its findings.
Loading graph…
Trace evidence
The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.
Impact
Blast radius — if you change this requirement, what else may need re-checking, and what it in turn depends on.
Impact
Blast radius — if you change this requirement, what else may need re-checking, and what it in turn depends on.
If you change this
Files to re-check (1)
- parser.goparser.go
Tests to re-run (6)
- empty_key_path_test.goempty_key_path_test.go
- mcdc_spec_witnesses_test.gomcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go
- obligation_evidence_test.goobligation_evidence_test.go
- parser_test.goparser_test.go
- property_test.goproperty_test.go
- reference_oracle_test.goreference_oracle_test.go
What this rests on
Parent requirements (1)
Discussions
Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.