Proof Portal

Projects

jsonparser

ProbeLabs23 findings · 123 requirements
Showing the current git stateNo audit has been synced for this project yet — verification results (proof status, coverage, solver signals) appear once an audit is published.proof-demod79405e
All requirements
RequirementSYS-REQ-039SystemApproved

When ParseInt receives an integer token whose magnitude exceeds the supported int64 range, the parser shall return the documented overflow error.

1 open known issue affect this requirement (worst severity: High). All 1/1 obligations are satisfied.
PriorityshallTypeguaranteeCategoryfunctionalComponentparserAssuranceEFindingsHighworst open

Specification

The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.

Description

When ParseInt receives an integer token whose magnitude exceeds the supported int64 range, the parser shall return the documented overflow error.

FRETish formula
the parser shall always satisfy !raw_int_token_overflows_int64 | returns_parseint_overflow_error
View full formal model

Rationale & tags

Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.

Overflow is an externally visible ParseInt outcome and should be specified independently from valid integer parsing and malformed-token rejection.

decompositionparseintoverflow

Verification & provenance

How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).

Assurance levelE
Formalizationvalid
Strategyfretish

Review

Status
approved
Reviewer
Buger · lead_engineer
Reviewed
Aug 20, 2026, 13:11 UTC
Spec-conformance reviewed (agent:claude:spec-conformance); approved on owner authorization.

History

Created
Apr 14, 2026, 15:45 UTC · Codex · AI agent
Modified
Aug 20, 2026, 13:11 UTC · Buger

Change history

Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.

Review history

Human and AI-agent approvals of this requirement — the 'why was this approved' lineage, each with the reviewer's justification and the code it cites.

  1. Claude:spec Conformance · AI agentApprovedSpec conformanceAug 20, 2026 · last monthREVIEW-94

    The invariant !raw_int_token_overflows_int64 | returns_parseint_overflow_error requires an int64-overflowing token to yield OverflowIntegerError, and ParseInt (parser.go:2168) correctly surfaces OverflowIntegerError when parseInt reports overflow. The defect is in parseInt: its fast-path digit-count gate is if l-i < 20 instead of < 19 (bytes.go:27), so a 19-digit value takes the unchecked int64 accumulation loop that wraps silently and returns (wrapped, true, false) with no overflow signal, so ParseInt returns a wrong value and nil error for e.g. 9999999999999999999. This is the intentional overflow defect tracked by KI-7 (CWE-190), witnessed by TestDemoKI7 and the MCDC Row2 invariant-violation test. Wrapper is correct; tracked overflow-check defect makes verification honestly fail — approvable.

    Cited code (2)

Open known issues

Findings currently open against this requirement — issues its verification surfaced that are not resolved yet. Each links to the full finding.

Obligations

What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.

1 obligation · 1 discharged

Browse the catalogue
Discharged

Behavior at limits, thresholds, and edge-of-range values.

If it were violatedHigh

ParseInt on 99999999999999999999 silently wraps via strconv to a negative int64 (ignoring ErrRange), producing a wrong-sign value at the caller.

Discharging evidence1/1 required witnessed
  • nominalrequiredpresent
    Covered by 1 test

Formula evidence

The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).

FRETish formula

the parser shall always satisfy !raw_int_token_overflows_int64 | returns_parseint_overflow_error

Variables

NameTypeDirectionDescription
raw_int_token_overflows_int64True when ParseInt receives an integer token whose magnitude exceeds the supported int64 range.
returns_parseint_overflow_errorTrue when ParseInt returns the documented overflow error for an integer token outside the supported int64 range.

Witnesses· 3 scenarios total

  • TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_039_Row1_NoOverflow
    exercises 1 condition scenario
  • TestMCDC_SYS_REQ_039_Row2_InvariantViolation
    exercises 1 condition scenario
  • TestParseInt
    exercises 1 condition scenario

MC/DC truth table· 3 rows

Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.

Covereda test exercises this rowExempteda reviewed mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test
#raw_int_token_overflows_int64returns_parseint_overflow_errorResultProvesCovering test
1FFTraw_int_token_overflows_int64
2TFFraw_int_token_overflows_int64
3TTTreturns_parseint_overflow_error

Its place

How this requirement connects — what proves it, what it affects, and what it rests on. Authored links only here; automatically derived links come from the audit index.

Loading graph…

Trace evidence

The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.

Impact

Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).

If you change this

Requirements
0
Files
1
Tests
3
At-risk contracts
0

Files to re-check (1)

  • parser.goparser.go

Tests to re-run (3)

  • mcdc_spec_witnesses_test.gomcdc_spec_witnesses_test.go
  • obligation_evidence_test.goobligation_evidence_test.go
  • parser_test.goparser_test.go

What this rests on

Changes

Semantic changes that move or scope this requirement — the intended work touching it. Each links to the full change.

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in