Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabsviewing a historical run

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Viewing historical run 5ee801eOct 2, 2026, 04:35 AMpr/13012Back to current
Back to findings
Known issueKI-MENU-SELECT-GEOMETRY-INT-COERCION

Geometry flags silently coerce non-numeric and flag-like values: --width abc summons width 0

OpenOpenLow

Low-severity issue, currently open.

Description

The issue as recorded.

parse_arguments accepts any following word as a geometry value (arity check only, bin/omarchy-menu-select:42) and encode_payload's Perl int() silently coerces non-integers (int(abc)=0, int(10.9)=10, line 86). parse_arguments consumes a value that names a known flag (--width --height 400) as the width and drops the 400 as an unknown token. The summon proceeds with corrupted geometry and no error.

Affected requirements

The requirement(s) this issue violates — click through to the spec.

Severity, explained

Why this is rated the way it is — and the scoring signals behind the rating (each ⓘ explains the term).

LowRated severity — the impact if this issue is exploited or hit.
why this rating
Risk-rated
risk area
Correctness
Security classification
Not a security surface
CVE surface
None

How it's proven

The reproducer — an actual test that drives the real code and shows the issue happening. Run it yourself, or peek the test and the source it covers.

Known issue reproducedprofileknown_issue_reproducerprovesSW-REQ-260922-Q6ZS
Reproducer test
Run it yourself
./pocs/crs-260930-k02d-c04-c16.sh
Covers (2)
Last run Sep 30, 2026, 11:02 PM

Reproduction steps

Technical steps for your engineers to confirm the issue by hand.

./pocs/crs-260930-k02d-c04-c16.sh

What protects you, and the fix

What limits your exposure today, and the planned remediation.

What protects you now

In-tree callers pass numeric geometry or omit the flags; the swallow needs a flag-shaped value from a hand-built command

The fix

Validate geometry values at parse time: reject non-numeric tokens and a value that matches a known flag, with a usage error

Blast radius

If you touch this issue, what else may need re-checking — the requirements it affects and the code and tests that hang off them. Historical view: authored trace links only — automatically derived links aren't reconstructible for past runs.

Tracing blast radius…

Touch this finding and you re-check 1 requirements · 1 code files · 1 tests.

Requirements (1)
Code files (1)
  • omarchy-menu-select
Tests (1)
  • menu-dmenu-test.sh

Per-requirement evidence

For each requirement this finding touches: the implementing code, verifying tests, and proof obligations that discharge it.

Implementing code (1)
  • bin/omarchy-menu-select
Tests & evidence (1)
  • test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh
Proof obligations (2)
external_call_timeout_bounded

Every cross-process call shall declare connect, read, and total deadlines; no external call is defaulted to "no timeout."

  • ✗nominal (required)
input_domain

A parser, reader, or configuration loader states its accepted input domain at the byte level and what happens for each partition of it.

  • ✓nominal (required) — test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:140, test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:145, test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:150, test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:155, test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:161
  • ✓negative — test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:165, test/shell.d/menu-dmenu-test.sh:171

Evidence trail

The raw evidence manifests behind this finding — superseded by the resolved reproducer above, kept here for traceability.

  • proof/evidence/ki-menu-select-geometry-int-coercion.yaml

Change history

Every recorded revision of this finding's source file — when it was added, edited, or re-classified, with the diff for each change.

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in