Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabs65 findings · 95 requirements

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Inbox
ReportR-1137GitHub issuePublicDecided· Out of scope

windowrule opacity: active-state "override" has no effect when loaded from config (reload), only when injected live via hyprctl eval

Reported by granite4lyfe · filed Aug 31, 2026 · open at source

Decided: Out of scope — decided by agents · verified 4 days ago.

At a glance

1 · What is claimed?
Only the report text below — no validator has restated it as checkable claims yet.
2 · What does it affect?
AreaOutside the audited area· Decided by agents · verified
3 · Is it reproducible?
No validation has been run yet.
4 · What remains unclear?
  • Not validated yet: no claims, no reproducer.
5 · What happens next?
Decided by agents and verified by a second, independent agent — see the decision.

Original report

windowrule opacity: active-state "override" has no effect when loaded from config (reload), only when injected live via hyprctl evalrevision 1 · captured 2026-09-28 21:24 UTC via poll

What happened

A windowrule that sets active-state opacity to 1.0 override (fully opaque
when focused) has no visible effect when it's loaded from a Lua config file
via hyprctl reload, even though the identical rule injected live via
hyprctl eval fixes it immediately. This holds for both tag: and class:
matches — it's not about which match type is used, it's specifically about
the file+reload path vs. live eval.

Inactive-state override (0.96 override) works correctly either way — only
the active state is affected.

Expected

A windowrule loaded from config via hyprctl reload should behave the same
as the identical rule applied live via hyprctl eval.

Steps to reproduce

  1. In ~/.config/hypr/windows.lua (Omarchy's Lua config layer), add:

o.window({ class = "<some app class>" }, { opacity = "1.0 override 0.96 override" })
(Omarchy's own default rule already tags all windows and applies
opacity 0.985 0.96 via tag:default-opacity —
/usr/share/omarchy/default/hypr/windows.lua — so any window will show
some transparency by default; this rule is meant to force full opacity
on top of that.)
2. hyprctl reload, then hyprctl configerrors (clean, no errors).
3. Open a completely fresh instance of that app (not one that was already
open before step 1/2). Focus it — wallpaper is still visibly bleeding
through. Unfocus it — the 0.96 override does correctly apply (dims as
expected).
4. Now run the identical rule live instead:
hyprctl eval 'hl.window_rule({match = {class = "<same app class>"}, opacity = "1.0 override 0.96 override"})'
— this applies correctly and immediately on the same window, both states.

Tested clean on multiple fresh windows (Nautilus, a fresh foot terminal)
with no other opacity rules touching them, before and after omarchy update
(4.0.1-1 → 4.0.2-1) — same result every time. Tested with both tag: and
class: match types in the file — both fail the same way; only the eval
path works.

System

  • Omarchy 4.0.2-1
  • Hyprland 0.56.2
  • Kernel 7.1.9-arch1-2
  • GPU: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (amdgpu, RDNA-4)
  • Display: Wayland, Hyprland compositor, XWayland 24.1.13

Screenshot

Attached below — a focused Nautilus window with the wallpaper visibly
showing through despite the override rule.

View raw text
## What happened
A windowrule that sets active-state opacity to `1.0 override` (fully opaque
when focused) has no visible effect when it's loaded from a Lua config file
via `hyprctl reload`, even though the identical rule injected live via
`hyprctl eval` fixes it immediately. This holds for both `tag:` and `class:`
matches — it's not about which match type is used, it's specifically about
the file+reload path vs. live eval.

Inactive-state override (`0.96 override`) works correctly either way — only
the active state is affected.

## Expected
A windowrule loaded from config via `hyprctl reload` should behave the same
as the identical rule applied live via `hyprctl eval`.

## Steps to reproduce
1. In `~/.config/hypr/windows.lua` (Omarchy's Lua config layer), add:
   `o.window({ class = "<some app class>" }, { opacity = "1.0 override 0.96 override" })`
   (Omarchy's own default rule already tags all windows and applies
   `opacity 0.985 0.96` via `tag:default-opacity` —
   `/usr/share/omarchy/default/hypr/windows.lua` — so any window will show
   *some* transparency by default; this rule is meant to force full opacity
   on top of that.)
2. `hyprctl reload`, then `hyprctl configerrors` (clean, no errors).
3. Open a completely fresh instance of that app (not one that was already
   open before step 1/2). Focus it — wallpaper is still visibly bleeding
   through. Unfocus it — the 0.96 override *does* correctly apply (dims as
   expected).
4. Now run the identical rule live instead:
   `hyprctl eval 'hl.window_rule({match = {class = "<same app class>"}, opacity = "1.0 override 0.96 override"})'`
   — this applies correctly and immediately on the same window, both states.

Tested clean on multiple fresh windows (Nautilus, a fresh `foot` terminal)
with no other opacity rules touching them, before and after `omarchy update`
(4.0.1-1 → 4.0.2-1) — same result every time. Tested with both `tag:` and
`class:` match types in the file — both fail the same way; only the eval
path works.

## System
- Omarchy 4.0.2-1
- Hyprland 0.56.2
- Kernel 7.1.9-arch1-2
- GPU: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (amdgpu, RDNA-4)
- Display: Wayland, Hyprland compositor, XWayland 24.1.13

## Screenshot
Attached below — a focused Nautilus window with the wallpaper visibly
showing through despite the override rule.

Validation

Not checked yet. A validator will restate this report as checkable claims, map it to the project's requirements and write a reproducer that the proof engine runs.

Linked

Not linked to any known issue, other report or change yet.

Decision

Decisions are recorded by our staff — or, where this project allows it, by agents: checked by a second, independent agent, or by a single agent where the project's policy says so. Any decision reached so far is shown below.

  • Out of scopeDecided by agents · verified · 2026-10-09 10:21 UTC