Proof Portal
Omarchy
ProbeLabs65 findings · 95 requirementsA proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.
Browser managed policy directories are world-writable
Reported by afurm · filed May 2, 2026 · open at source
At a glance
- 1 · What is claimed?
- Only the report text below — no validator has restated it as checkable claims yet.
- 2 · What does it affect?
- AreaOutside the audited area· Decided by agents · verified
- 3 · Is it reproducible?
- No validation has been run yet.
- 4 · What remains unclear?
- Not validated yet: no claims, no reproducer.
- 5 · What happens next?
- Decided by agents and verified by a second, independent agent — see the decision.
Original report
System details
Omarchy dev branch at 3fabdf73; Chromium/Brave browser policy setup; hardware independent
What's wrong?
Omarchy creates Chromium and Brave managed policy directories under /etc, then makes them writable by every local user.
Affected files:
install/config/theme.shmigrations/1757147211.sh
Current behavior:
sudo mkdir -p /etc/chromium/policies/managed
sudo chmod a+rw /etc/chromium/policies/managed
sudo mkdir -p /etc/brave/policies/managed
sudo chmod a+rw /etc/brave/policies/managedThese directories are privileged browser managed-policy inputs. Chromium's Linux policy docs say managed policy files/directories should not be writable by non-admin users.
Steps to recreate:
- Run the Omarchy install path or the existing migration that creates browser policy directories.
- Check permissions:
ls -ld /etc/chromium/policies/managed /etc/brave/policies/managed- Notice that non-root users can write files into those directories.
Expected behavior:
The managed policy directories should remain root/admin writable only, for example root-owned mode 755. Omarchy can still update color.json by writing it through sudo.
Actual behavior:
The directories are made writable by everyone so omarchy-theme-set-browser can write color.json without sudo.
Suggested fix:
- Create
/etc/chromium/policies/managedand/etc/brave/policies/managedwith root ownership and mode755. - Write
color.jsonviasudo tee. - Set
color.jsonto root-owned mode644. - Add a migration to repair permissions on existing installs.
I have a patch prepared for this.
View raw text
### System details Omarchy dev branch at 3fabdf73; Chromium/Brave browser policy setup; hardware independent ### What's wrong? Omarchy creates Chromium and Brave managed policy directories under `/etc`, then makes them writable by every local user. Affected files: - `install/config/theme.sh` - `migrations/1757147211.sh` Current behavior: ```bash sudo mkdir -p /etc/chromium/policies/managed sudo chmod a+rw /etc/chromium/policies/managed sudo mkdir -p /etc/brave/policies/managed sudo chmod a+rw /etc/brave/policies/managed ``` These directories are privileged browser managed-policy inputs. Chromium's Linux policy docs say managed policy files/directories should not be writable by non-admin users. Steps to recreate: 1. Run the Omarchy install path or the existing migration that creates browser policy directories. 2. Check permissions: ```bash ls -ld /etc/chromium/policies/managed /etc/brave/policies/managed ``` 3. Notice that non-root users can write files into those directories. Expected behavior: The managed policy directories should remain root/admin writable only, for example root-owned mode `755`. Omarchy can still update `color.json` by writing it through `sudo`. Actual behavior: The directories are made writable by everyone so `omarchy-theme-set-browser` can write `color.json` without sudo. Suggested fix: - Create `/etc/chromium/policies/managed` and `/etc/brave/policies/managed` with root ownership and mode `755`. - Write `color.json` via `sudo tee`. - Set `color.json` to root-owned mode `644`. - Add a migration to repair permissions on existing installs. I have a patch prepared for this.
Validation
Not checked yet. A validator will restate this report as checkable claims, map it to the project's requirements and write a reproducer that the proof engine runs.
Linked
Not linked to any known issue, other report or change yet.
Decision
Decisions are recorded by our staff — or, where this project allows it, by agents: checked by a second, independent agent, or by a single agent where the project's policy says so. Any decision reached so far is shown below.
- Out of scopeDecided by agents · verified · 2026-10-09 02:52 UTC