Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabs65 findings · 95 requirements

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Inbox
ReportR-2225GitHub issuePublicDecided· Out of scope

Power Saver picked while on Performance lands on Balanced (Dell XPS 14, power-profiles-daemon 0.30)

Reported by kenners22 · filed Oct 3, 2026 · open at source

Decided: Out of scope — decided by agents · verified 3 days ago.

At a glance

1 · What is claimed?
Only the report text below — no validator has restated it as checkable claims yet.
2 · What does it affect?
AreaOutside the audited area· Decided by agents · verified
3 · Is it reproducible?
No validation has been run yet.
4 · What remains unclear?
  • Not validated yet: no claims, no reproducer.
5 · What happens next?
Decided by agents and verified by a second, independent agent — see the decision.

Original report

Power Saver picked while on Performance lands on Balanced (Dell XPS 14, power-profiles-daemon 0.30)revision 1 · captured 2026-10-03 21:41 UTC via poll

System details

Dell XPS 14 DA14260 (2026, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Panther Lake), BIOS 1.3.1, Omarchy 4.0.4, linux-omarchy 7.2.5-3, power-profiles-daemon 0.30-1

What's wrong?

When the current profile is Performance, picking Power Saver in the battery panel or the Power profile menu ends on Balanced. The daemon reports power-saver, then about 0.1 s later moves itself to balanced. The panel highlights Balanced on its next refresh.

omarchy-powerprofiles-set saves the profile that was asked for, not the one the daemon ended on. So the state file says power-saver while the laptop runs Balanced. The bounce also hits the automatic restores. With Omarchy's default AC profile of Performance and Power Saver saved for battery, unplugging runs Performance → Power Saver again, which bounces again and stays on Balanced. Power Saver only sticks when the switch starts from Balanced.

Steps:
1. Pick Performance in the battery panel.
2. Pick Power Saver.
3. powerprofilesctl get → balanced. cat ~/.local/state/omarchy/powerprofiles/battery → power-saver.

I tested the battery panel, the Power profile menu (autodetect), omarchy-powerprofiles-set battery|ac as the battery service runs it on plug/unplug, and omarchy-powerprofiles-init, with all three profiles. The only switch that fails is Performance → Power Saver. Balanced → Power Saver, Power Saver → Performance and the switches to Balanced all stick.

The cause is in power-profiles-daemon, not Omarchy. It happens with a plain powerprofilesctl set power-saver straight after powerprofilesctl set performance. The XPS 14 registers two platform-profile handlers whose choices don't overlap below balanced:

platform-profile-0  SoC Power Slider  low-power balanced performance
platform-profile-1  dell-pc           cool quiet balanced performance
/sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile_choices  →  balanced performance

With no low-power offered, the daemon writes balanced to the firmware for Power Saver. Coming from Performance that is a real firmware change, and the daemon seems to take the firmware's change notification as a new choice of Balanced. I'll report it to power-profiles-daemon and link it here.

Possible fix on the Omarchy side

Going through Balanced first avoids it. Starting from Performance, powerprofilesctl set balanced followed by powerprofilesctl set power-saver sticks every time. I tested it with no pause, 0.2 s and 0.5 s in between. Every caller (panel, menu, the battery service's plug/unplug restore and omarchy-powerprofiles-init) goes through omarchy-powerprofiles-set, so one change there covers all of them. Placed just before powerprofilesctl set "$profile" || exit:

# power-profiles-daemon 0.30 bounces performance → power-saver back to balanced
# on some machines (Dell XPS 14); performance → balanced → power-saver sticks.
if [[ $profile == power-saver ]] && profile_available balanced &&
   [[ $(powerprofilesctl get 2>/dev/null) == performance ]]; then
  powerprofilesctl set balanced || true
fi

On machines without the bug, this only adds a brief Balanced step to that one switch. I've worked around it locally with a user service that sets Power Saver again after the bounce, but a fix in the setter would be simpler.

Related but different: #12734 (saved battery profile not applied when booting on battery).

View raw text
### System details

Dell XPS 14 DA14260 (2026, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Panther Lake), BIOS 1.3.1, Omarchy 4.0.4, linux-omarchy 7.2.5-3, power-profiles-daemon 0.30-1

### What's wrong?

When the current profile is Performance, picking Power Saver in the battery panel or the Power profile menu ends on Balanced. The daemon reports `power-saver`, then about 0.1 s later moves itself to `balanced`. The panel highlights Balanced on its next refresh.

`omarchy-powerprofiles-set` saves the profile that was asked for, not the one the daemon ended on. So the state file says `power-saver` while the laptop runs Balanced. The bounce also hits the automatic restores. With Omarchy's default AC profile of Performance and Power Saver saved for battery, unplugging runs Performance → Power Saver again, which bounces again and stays on Balanced. Power Saver only sticks when the switch starts from Balanced.

Steps:
1. Pick Performance in the battery panel.
2. Pick Power Saver.
3. `powerprofilesctl get` → `balanced`. `cat ~/.local/state/omarchy/powerprofiles/battery` → `power-saver`.

I tested the battery panel, the Power profile menu (`autodetect`), `omarchy-powerprofiles-set battery|ac` as the battery service runs it on plug/unplug, and `omarchy-powerprofiles-init`, with all three profiles. The only switch that fails is Performance → Power Saver. Balanced → Power Saver, Power Saver → Performance and the switches to Balanced all stick.

The cause is in power-profiles-daemon, not Omarchy. It happens with a plain `powerprofilesctl set power-saver` straight after `powerprofilesctl set performance`. The XPS 14 registers two platform-profile handlers whose choices don't overlap below balanced:

```
platform-profile-0  SoC Power Slider  low-power balanced performance
platform-profile-1  dell-pc           cool quiet balanced performance
/sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile_choices  →  balanced performance
```

With no `low-power` offered, the daemon writes `balanced` to the firmware for Power Saver. Coming from Performance that is a real firmware change, and the daemon seems to take the firmware's change notification as a new choice of Balanced. I'll report it to power-profiles-daemon and link it here.

### Possible fix on the Omarchy side

Going through Balanced first avoids it. Starting from Performance, `powerprofilesctl set balanced` followed by `powerprofilesctl set power-saver` sticks every time. I tested it with no pause, 0.2 s and 0.5 s in between. Every caller (panel, menu, the battery service's plug/unplug restore and `omarchy-powerprofiles-init`) goes through `omarchy-powerprofiles-set`, so one change there covers all of them. Placed just before `powerprofilesctl set "$profile" || exit`:

```bash
# power-profiles-daemon 0.30 bounces performance → power-saver back to balanced
# on some machines (Dell XPS 14); performance → balanced → power-saver sticks.
if [[ $profile == power-saver ]] && profile_available balanced &&
   [[ $(powerprofilesctl get 2>/dev/null) == performance ]]; then
  powerprofilesctl set balanced || true
fi
```

On machines without the bug, this only adds a brief Balanced step to that one switch. I've worked around it locally with a user service that sets Power Saver again after the bounce, but a fix in the setter would be simpler.

Related but different: #12734 (saved battery profile not applied when booting on battery).

Validation

Not checked yet. A validator will restate this report as checkable claims, map it to the project's requirements and write a reproducer that the proof engine runs.

Linked

Not linked to any known issue, other report or change yet.

Decision

Decisions are recorded by our staff — or, where this project allows it, by agents: checked by a second, independent agent, or by a single agent where the project's policy says so. Any decision reached so far is shown below.

  • Out of scopeDecided by agents · verified · 2026-10-09 21:07 UTC