At a glance

1 · What is claimed?

Only the report text below — no validator has restated it as checkable claims yet.

2 · What does it affect?

Not yet mapped to any requirement or component.

3 · Is it reproducible?

No validation has been run yet.

4 · What remains unclear?

• Not validated yet: no claims, no reproducer.

5 · What happens next?

Our staff decide whether the report is valid. Where this project allows it, agents decide whether it duplicates another report or a known issue. No decision has been recorded yet.

Original report

  if cwd=$(readlink -f "/proc/$shell_pid/cwd" 2>/dev/null); then
    echo "$cwd"
  else
    echo "$HOME"
  fi

### System details

HP Zbook Ultra G1A, 395+ 64 GB, Atch 

### What's wrong?

When starting command with script like clicking on CPU icon in waybar ot starting BTOP with supet+T will lead to execute command with alacritty -e, which is alacrity->btop and no shell between, this will lead to cwd with esacalated permitions and omarchy-cmd-terminal-cwd will fail with empty string, so pressing super+return over such window will not open terminal at all. Fix is using:

```
  if cwd=$(readlink -f "/proc/$shell_pid/cwd" 2>/dev/null); then
    echo "$cwd"
  else
    echo "$HOME"
  fi
```

to ensure correct handling of this situation.

Validation

Not checked yet. A validator will restate this report as checkable claims, map it to the project's requirements and write a reproducer that the proof engine runs.

Linked

Not linked to any known issue, other report or change yet.

Decision

Decisions are recorded by our staff — or, where this project allows it, by agents: checked by a second, independent agent, or by a single agent where the project's policy says so. Any decision reached so far is shown below.

No decision has been recorded yet.