Proof Portal
Omarchy
ProbeLabs65 findings · 95 requirementsA proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.
Proposal to Adopt the No Code of Conduct (NCoC) for a Truly Free Project
Reported by coffnix · filed Sep 26, 2025Closed upstream on 2025-09-26 by ryanrhughes. GitHub close reason: completed. No closing PR or commit is recorded — "completed" alone is not evidence of a fix.
At a glance
- 1 · What is claimed?
- Only the report text below — no validator has restated it as checkable claims yet.
- 2 · What does it affect?
- Not yet mapped to any requirement or component.
- 3 · Is it reproducible?
- No validation has been run yet.
- 4 · What remains unclear?
- Not validated yet: no claims, no reproducer.
- 5 · What happens next?
- Our staff decide whether the report is valid. Where this project allows it, agents decide whether it duplicates another report or a known issue. No decision has been recorded yet.
Original report
What do you need?
Given that the previous issue (https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy/issues/1913) suggesting a Code of Conduct was arbitrarily closed as "not planned"
<img width="958" height="362" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/afe3cd71-38ce-4f61-af41-9279d2266ef3" />
I'm opening this enhancement proposal to recommend adopting the No Code of Conduct (NCoC) instead. This would make it crystal clear that we're not into that woke nonsense of enforcing Contributor Covenants or any other virtue-signaling processes for "dealing with toxic behavior." Let's keep the project focused on code and contributions, not on policing speech or feelings. NCoC ensures freedom and avoids the drama that comes with typical CoCs. What do you think?
This: https://github.com/area31/NCoC
In pt_BR and en_US
The real reason is that I couldn't express my opinion in the previous issue by giving a dislike. And that's why I'm leaving here my sincere dislike about someone asking for a CoC, and already suggesting the NCoC in advance.
View raw text
### What do you need? Given that the previous issue (https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy/issues/1913) suggesting a Code of Conduct was arbitrarily closed as "not planned" <img width="958" height="362" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/afe3cd71-38ce-4f61-af41-9279d2266ef3" /> I'm opening this enhancement proposal to recommend adopting the No Code of Conduct (NCoC) instead. This would make it crystal clear that we're not into that woke nonsense of enforcing Contributor Covenants or any other virtue-signaling processes for "dealing with toxic behavior." Let's keep the project focused on code and contributions, not on policing speech or feelings. NCoC ensures freedom and avoids the drama that comes with typical CoCs. What do you think? This: https://github.com/area31/NCoC In pt_BR and en_US The real reason is that I couldn't express my opinion in the previous issue by giving a dislike. And that's why I'm leaving here my sincere dislike about someone asking for a CoC, and already suggesting the NCoC in advance.
- afe3cd71-38ce-4f61-af41-9279d2266ef3
Validation
Not checked yet. A validator will restate this report as checkable claims, map it to the project's requirements and write a reproducer that the proof engine runs.
Linked
Not linked to any known issue, other report or change yet.
Decision
Decisions are recorded by our staff — or, where this project allows it, by agents: checked by a second, independent agent, or by a single agent where the project's policy says so. Any decision reached so far is shown below.
No decision has been recorded yet.