Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabs65 findings · 95 requirements

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Inbox
ReportR-4119GitHub issuePublicReceived

UKI Build Regression: Illegal Instruction (Exit Status 32) on x86-64-v2 Hardware

Reported by acraig78 · filed Feb 14, 2026Closed upstream on 2026-02-22 by ryanrhughes, as a duplicate of #4554 (R-4105). GitHub close reason: duplicate.

Received and recorded verbatim. Nothing has been checked yet.

At a glance

1 · What is claimed?
Only the report text below — no validator has restated it as checkable claims yet.
2 · What does it affect?
Not yet mapped to any requirement or component.
3 · Is it reproducible?
No validation has been run yet.
4 · What remains unclear?
  • Not validated yet: no claims, no reproducer.
5 · What happens next?
Our staff decide whether the report is valid. Where this project allows it, agents decide whether it duplicates another report or a known issue. No decision has been recorded yet.

Original report

UKI Build Regression: Illegal Instruction (Exit Status 32) on x86-64-v2 Hardwarerevision 1 · captured 2026-10-04 11:49 UTC via poll

System details

Intel Core m3-8100Y, Surface Go 2, Omarchy 3.3.3

What's wrong?

UKI Build Regression: Illegal Instruction (Exit Status 32) on x86-64-v2 Hardware

System Info:

CPU: Intel Core m3-8100Y (Surface Go 2)

Architecture Level: x86-64-v2 (AVX/AVX2 flags missing/disabled in firmware)

Kernel: Working on 6.18.3-arch1-1 | Fails on 6.18.7

While updating to kernel 6.18.7, the post-transaction hooks for building the Unified Kernel Image (UKI) fail with an "illegal instruction" error. This results in an exit status 32 during the systemd-remount-fs stage upon reboot, forcing the system into Emergency Mode.

Technical Details:

A manual trigger of mkinitcpio (e.g., via intel-ucode reinstall) works perfectly on kernel 6.18.3.

The failure occurs during the 6.18.7 update's Updating linux initcpios phase.

lscpu confirms the hardware is limited to x86-64-v2.

The crash is likely caused by a toolchain dependency (likely zstd, mkinitcpio, or ukify) in the latest update being compiled with x86-64-v3 (AVX2) instructions.

Steps to Reproduce:

Use an Intel m3-8100Y or similar v2-only CPU.

Attempt to upgrade to kernel 6.18.7-arch1-1.

Observe the trap invalid opcode or exit status 32 during the UKI build hooks.

View raw text
### System details

Intel Core m3-8100Y, Surface Go 2, Omarchy 3.3.3

### What's wrong?

UKI Build Regression: Illegal Instruction (Exit Status 32) on x86-64-v2 Hardware

System Info:

CPU: Intel Core m3-8100Y (Surface Go 2)

Architecture Level: x86-64-v2 (AVX/AVX2 flags missing/disabled in firmware)

Kernel: Working on 6.18.3-arch1-1 | Fails on 6.18.7

While updating to kernel 6.18.7, the post-transaction hooks for building the Unified Kernel Image (UKI) fail with an "illegal instruction" error. This results in an exit status 32 during the systemd-remount-fs stage upon reboot, forcing the system into Emergency Mode.

Technical Details:

A manual trigger of mkinitcpio (e.g., via intel-ucode reinstall) works perfectly on kernel 6.18.3.

The failure occurs during the 6.18.7 update's Updating linux initcpios phase.

lscpu confirms the hardware is limited to x86-64-v2.

The crash is likely caused by a toolchain dependency (likely zstd, mkinitcpio, or ukify) in the latest update being compiled with x86-64-v3 (AVX2) instructions.

Steps to Reproduce:

Use an Intel m3-8100Y or similar v2-only CPU.

Attempt to upgrade to kernel 6.18.7-arch1-1.

Observe the trap invalid opcode or exit status 32 during the UKI build hooks.

Validation

Not checked yet. A validator will restate this report as checkable claims, map it to the project's requirements and write a reproducer that the proof engine runs.

Linked

Not linked to any known issue, other report or change yet.

Decision

Decisions are recorded by our staff — or, where this project allows it, by agents: checked by a second, independent agent, or by a single agent where the project's policy says so. Any decision reached so far is shown below.

No decision has been recorded yet.