open() gains if (root.deleteConfirmOpen) root.cancelDelete() (Menu.qml:29) before it dispatches to openDmenu() or openRoute(). Before, the only place the confirmation was cleared was onOpenedChanged (Menu.qml:91), and a summon over an open menu keeps opened true, so the dialog stayed up with Uninstall preselected and took the next Enter: the key meant for the new prompt removed the app's desktop file and cancelled the prompt (#14052). cancelDelete() is the dialog's own Cancel path (Menu.qml:860): it removes nothing. VJR1 is new proof work that states the rule; the executable line is the upstream line unchanged.

8CQ4's clauses are unchanged. Its trace was re-reviewed with citations (requestDeleteSelected, cancelDelete and confirmDelete are byte-identical; a summon now reaches the cancel arm from open()), and its derived verification_state moved from failing (on 58cd8018) to not_started because its only failing signal was the known issue this PR fixes. Proof work, not upstream.

Menu.qml carries a file-level fingerprint, so any edit to it stales every requirement traced to the file. All of them were re-reviewed with citations: only open() changed, and every other function is byte-identical (shifted by 3 lines). Their clauses and FRETish are unchanged (review.changes: code_changed). 50RE (open() dispatch) gains the new requirement in the same // Implements: line; its dispatch on mode is unchanged. PRNV, CYB9 and 74BZ (route resolution) are traced to Menu.qml by the baseline's own // Implements: line above resolveRoute (Menu.qml:959), so the PR's edit to the file stales them too; resolveRoute and openRoute are untouched by the PR.

The harness test/bdiff/harness.mjs and the 6 seq-delete-confirm-*.events inputs trace to VJR1. The behaviour-diff run (219 inputs, base 58cd8018, head ca9c8878) executed each input at the base and the head with no harness error, and every difference it found is classified intended, so the package records each as passed (observedBy behavior_diff). The 3 summon inputs witness the summon-over-confirmation row; Enter, Escape and the Cancel button on the dialog itself are the controls and print identical output at base and head. The reviewer re-ran the harness on the 6 inputs against the 58cd8018 and the head shell tree: the 3 summon inputs differ exactly as recorded (input digests match; base removes firefox and cancels the request; head removes nothing and the request gets its answer) and the 3 controls print identical output.

review.compat checked test_diff (1 existing test file changed, 0 findings), mcdc_diff (86 decisions at the base, 87 at the head, 0 findings), removed_behavior (1 finding) and differential (219 inputs over 5 partitions, 3 findings). Same finding ids as the previous round. The 4 findings are unapproved; each is argued below. The package listing shows 20 auditor notes: the same acceptable-assessment note recorded 5 times for each of the 4 findings. They are notes for the maintainers, not approvals.

pocs/menu-qml-static.sh is listed under review.codeChanges.outOfScopeFiles; review.codeChanges maps 9/9 in-scope changed files and no changed file is unmapped. coverage_unmeasured (informs) names the 6 new .events inputs: they are data for the behaviour comparison, not code with lines to cover.

review.effects is absent (disclosure effects_unavailable), so call-path statements here come from reading the code. The test and the harness replay the real Menu.qml and ConfirmDialog.qml functions under node vm.

Evaluated ca9c8878 = proof baseline 58cd8018 (upstream quattro at 393a43d4) + 21e0501e (upstream 09bfcda4: the 3-line hunk in Menu.qml and the new test; its diff is line-for-line identical to the upstream PR diff, re-checked against gh pr diff) + proof work (VJR1 and its variables, spec conformance review REVIEW-261002-MV7M, evidence-backed trace re-reviews of the Menu.qml requirements, the static-check removal, the harness key events and 6 inputs, 9 annotation lines in the test that exist only on the mirror, known-issue evidence re-stamps and history ordering after the replay; then ec03d7c5, which rebuilds KI-MENU-OPEN-LEAVES-CONFIRM from the baseline's record with this PR's changes re-applied, and 6cd150cb, its evidence capture) + the empty record commit 7607396e + the tip ca9c8878. Against the previous mirror 15d3c8b2, outside re-stamped evidence only three files differ: proof.yaml (the baseline's menu variable budget, 130 to 140), the known-issue record, and the tip's STK-REQ-260922-XTNR trace review. Against 58cd8018 the only product file that changes is Menu.qml (the hunk plus the // Implements: line); upstream's Menu.qml is unchanged from 821ae589 (the PR's base) to 393a43d4, re-checked. Audit verdict at the head: pass (178 checks passed, 13 skipped by configuration, 28 not applicable); proof change freshness against 58cd8018: fresh.

The engine now reads Implements: in .jsonc files, so line 2 of default/omarchy/omarchy-menu.jsonc (a baseline line; this PR does not change the file) became a traced link with no review. The tip records one with citations; each cited line is what it claims: the jsonc annotation (line 2), the XTNR AC-001 acceptance tag in menu-acceptance-test.sh (line 12) and the XTNR nominal tag in menu-dispatcher-test.sh (line 48). XTNR is not among the package's changed requirements; suspect_clean and spec_lint_trace_review_evidence_current pass. Proof work only.

Re-checked the rebuilt record. (1) poc_quality notes: real_infrastructure (line 92) now says the static PoC pinned CNF1 on the baseline and that this change removes the anchor; current_deployment_relevance (line 95) scopes anchor CNF1 to the baseline and says open() now cancels; it no longer names a baseline SHA, and its claim that upstream Menu.qml has not changed since 821ae589 holds through 393a43d4. (2) risk is correctness (line 11), matching the 3 Oct severity justification (line 58); severity medium agrees with honest_severity and customer_impact. (3) remediation (line 19) and the note (line 21) name PR #14054 and VJR1. Also consistent: status fixed; affected requirements add VJR1; pocs/menu-qml-static.sh is no longer an evidence manifest; reproducer_command is the PR's test, bound by its Reproduces: marker (test line 93), and the tripwire mutation names exactly the guarded call at Menu.qml:29; history in time order. Leftover (wording only, no gate fails on it): the description, kept from the baseline, still cites (anchor CNF1) in the present tense, an anchor that no longer exists on this tree; and release_disposition ship_with_known_issue is moot once fixed. Not edited by this review.

proof/evidence/ki-menu-open-leaves-confirm.yaml records profile known_issue_reproducer, command bash test/shell.d/menu-uninstall-confirm-test.sh, status pass, observed_result known_issue_not_reproduced, polarity RED reproducer, requirements 8CQ4 and VJR1, with the tripwire mutation in its input set. Its revision ec03d7c5 is an ancestor of ca9c8878, and neither the record nor the test changed after it (only the evidence file and the XTNR trace did). The test's freshness hash (sha256:a49e7e88...) equals the file in the tree, and proof known-issue check --id KI-MENU-OPEN-LEAVES-CONFIRM reports it clean (no stale reproducer). known_issue_reproducer_consistent and known_issue_reproducer_present_and_resolves pass.