Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabsviewing a historical run

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Viewing historical run 0e2dd89Oct 1, 2026, 10:11 PMpr/13968Back to current
All requirements
RequirementSW-REQ-260912-41VVSoftwareReview

When fingerprint authentication is available, the lock view shall show the fingerprint indicator next to the password field.

Automated checks pass.
PriorityshallTypeguaranteeCategoryfunctionalComponentlockAssuranceCFindingsnone open

Specification

The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.

Description

When fingerprint authentication is available, the lock view shall show the fingerprint indicator next to the password field. When no fingerprint sensor is available, the lock view shall reserve no space for the indicator.

FRETish formula
when fingerprint_sensor_configured the lock_view shall always satisfy fingerprint_indicator_tracks_sensor
View full formal model

Rationale & tags

Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.

An indicator without a working sensor invites a touch that can never authenticate. Space reserved for a missing sensor shifts the password field.

Verification & provenance

How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).

Assurance levelC
Formalizationvalid
Realizabilityrealizable
Vacuitychecked_ok
Strategyfretish

Review

Status
in_review
Reviewer
Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
Reviewed
Sep 12, 2026, 23:50 UTC

History

Created
Sep 12, 2026, 19:51 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
Modified
Sep 12, 2026, 23:32 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent

Hazard review

Reviewed Sep 30, 2026, 06:50 UTCby agent:opencode-hazard-acatalog v1.10.1
  • scenarioreviewedboundary

    Worst case: an indicator shown with no sensor invites a touch that can never authenticate, and reserved space for a missing sensor shifts the password field. The configured/not-configured threshold is the whole trigger: the binding is fingerprintConfigured ? iconWidth+12 : 0, so both arms are the boundary pair.

  • propertyreviewedtotality

    Every fingerprintConfigured value yields a fully defined layout (indicator visibility plus reserved margins); both arms are witnessed by lock-fingerprint-indicator-test.sh.

  • structuralnot applicable

    QML declarative binding over a boolean and a measured glyph width; the icon text is a static string, so there is no encoding transform, numeric edge, or memory surface.

  • domainnot applicable

    Display-only layout; no trust boundary is crossed, no external call is made, and no auth decision is computed here.

Change history

Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.

Review history

Human and AI-agent approvals of this requirement — the 'why was this approved' lineage, each with the reviewer's justification and the code it cites.

  1. Kimi Dogfood · AI agentApprovedSpec conformanceSep 12, 2026 · 3 weeks agoREVIEW-5

    Fingerprint indicator visibility is bound to sensor configuration state; when no sensor is configured the indicator reserves no layout space, matching fingerprint_indicator_tracks_sensor in both polarities.

    Cited code (1)

Obligations

What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.

The tests that discharge each obligation aren't available for a historical run

The evidence matrix behind each obligation comes from the live audit index, which can't be rebuilt for a past commit. Nothing here means unknown — not that the requirement has no obligations.

Formula evidence

The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).

FRETish formula

when fingerprint_sensor_configured the lock_view shall always satisfy fingerprint_indicator_tracks_sensor

Witnesses· 2 scenarios total

  • lock-fingerprint-indicator-test.sh:1
    exercises 2 condition scenarios

MC/DC truth table· 3 rows

Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.

Covereda test exercises this rowExempteda reviewed mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test
#fingerprint_indicator_tracks_sensorfingerprint_sensor_configuredResultProvesCovering test
1FFTfingerprint_sensor_configured
2FTFfingerprint_indicator_tracks_sensor—
3TTTfingerprint_indicator_tracks_sensor

Its place

How this requirement connects — what proves it, what it affects, and what it rests on. Authored links only here; automatically derived links come from the audit index.

Loading graph…

Trace evidence

The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.

No findings affect this requirement

Nothing was flagged against this requirement in the pinned run.

Impact

Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).

If you change this

Requirements
0
Files
1
Tests
1
At-risk contracts
0

Files to re-check (1)

  • LockView.qmlshell/plugins/lock/LockView.qml

Tests to re-run (1)

  • lock-fingerprint-indicator-test.shtest/shell.d/lock-fingerprint-indicator-test.sh

What this rests on

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in