Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabsviewing a historical run

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Viewing historical run 020a8c0Sep 29, 2026, 09:27 AMquattroBack to current
All requirements
RequirementSW-REQ-260912-FAWVSoftwareReview

omarchy-system-sleep-lock shall derive the wait budget from the logind InhibitDelayMaxUSec property.

This requirement changed after its last recorded review, so approval is stale. Automated checks pass and 1/1 obligations are satisfied.
PriorityshallTypeguaranteeCategoryfunctionalComponentlockAssuranceCFindingsnone open

Specification

The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.

Description

omarchy-system-sleep-lock shall derive the wait budget from the logind InhibitDelayMaxUSec property. It shall reserve one fifth of the window but at least 1000 ms for logind. It shall fall back to 5000 ms when reading the property fails, and cap the result at 12000 ms. When the caller passes an argument that is not a positive integer within the cap, the script shall ignore it and use the derived budget.

FRETish formula
when suspend_imminent the sleep_lock shall always satisfy budget_bounded & budget_fallback_on_invalid
View full formal model

Rationale & tags

Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.

The shipped drop-in raises the inhibitor window to 15 s, but only logind knows the active value. A hand-raised window must not strand a closed laptop in a bag.

Verification & provenance

How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).

Assurance levelC
Formalizationvalid
Realizabilityrealizable
Vacuitychecked_ok
Strategyfretish

Review

Status
in_review
Reviewer
Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
Reviewed
Sep 12, 2026, 23:50 UTC

History

Created
Sep 12, 2026, 19:43 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
Modified
Sep 23, 2026, 17:20 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent

Change history

Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.

Review history

Human and AI-agent approvals of this requirement — the 'why was this approved' lineage, each with the reviewer's justification and the code it cites.

  1. Kimi Dogfood · AI agentApprovedSpec conformanceSep 12, 2026 · 3 weeks agoREVIEW-7

    Budget derivation matches: InhibitDelayMaxUSec is read, one fifth (>=1000 ms) is reserved for logind, and an invalid/unreadable property falls back to 5000 ms — budget_fallback_on_invalid. Tested with zero-window and not-a-number/99999999 scenarios.

    Cited code (1)

Obligations

What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.

1 obligation · 1 discharged

Browse the catalogue
Discharged

Behavior at limits, thresholds, and edge-of-range values.

Discharging evidence1/1 required witnessed
  • nominalrequiredpresent
    Covered by 1 test

Formula evidence

The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).

FRETish formula

when suspend_imminent the sleep_lock shall always satisfy budget_bounded & budget_fallback_on_invalid

Witnesses· 3 scenarios total

  • run_sleep_lock
    exercises 3 condition scenarios

MC/DC truth table· 5 rows

Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.

Covereda test exercises this rowExempteda reviewed mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test
#budget_boundedbudget_fallback_on_invalidsuspend_imminentResultProvesCovering test
1FFFTsuspend_imminent
2FFTFsuspend_imminentExempted · defensive — the deadline is always assigned from the validated argument, the derived logind window, or the 5000 ms fallback; no path leaves it unset (reviewed: REVIEW-7)
3FTTFbudget_boundedExempted · defensive — the fallback IS the 5000 ms bound; taking the fallback and ending unbounded is structurally absent (reviewed: REVIEW-7)
4TFTFbudget_fallback_on_invalid
5TTTTbudget_bounded

Its place

How this requirement connects — what proves it, what it affects, and what it rests on. Authored links only here; automatically derived links come from the audit index.

Loading graph…

Trace evidence

The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.

No findings affect this requirement

Nothing was flagged against this requirement in the pinned run.

Impact

Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).

If you change this

Requirements
0
Files
1
Tests
1
At-risk contracts
0

Files to re-check (1)

  • omarchy-system-sleep-lockbin/omarchy-system-sleep-lock

Tests to re-run (1)

  • sleep-lock-test.shtest/shell.d/sleep-lock-test.sh

What this rests on

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in