Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabsviewing a historical run

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Viewing historical run 020a8c0Sep 29, 2026, 09:27 AMquattroBack to current
All requirements
RequirementSW-REQ-260922-JRW1SoftwareReview

Applied guard results drive the view.

Automated checks pass.
PriorityshallTypeguaranteeCategoryfunctionalComponentmenuAssuranceCFindingsnone open

Specification

The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.

Description

Applied guard results drive the view. A row hides when its when: is false. A static submenu or link hides when no descendant is visible, while provider-backed menus stay visible. A checked:true or disabled:true row earns the check-mark label. A disabled row dims and skips the cursor.

FRETish formula
when guard_results_applied the menu_view shall eventually satisfy rows_hidden_or_marked_per_results
View full formal model

Rationale & tags

Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.

MenuModel.js isVisible lines 255-272, isDisabled lines 277-280, labelFor lines 284-288; menu-test.sh pins each arm.

Verification & provenance

How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).

Assurance levelC
Formalizationvalid
Realizabilityrealizable
Vacuitychecked_ok
Strategyfretish

Review

Status
in_review
Reviewer
Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agent
Reviewed
Sep 27, 2026, 20:50 UTC

History

Created
Sep 22, 2026, 14:27 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
Modified
Sep 27, 2026, 20:47 UTC · Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agent

Change history

Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.

Review history

Human and AI-agent approvals of this requirement — the 'why was this approved' lineage, each with the reviewer's justification and the code it cites.

  1. Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agentApprovedSpec conformanceSep 27, 2026 · 5 days agoREVIEW-23

    Read isVisible/isDisabled/labelFor branch by branch. when:false guard result returns false (row hidden) at MenuModel.js:291; leaf rows return true; provider menus stay visible; menus/links recurse over descendants with a depth cap of 32 (silent cycle-guard precondition the formula does not model - safety envelope only, never hit with a finite menu tree). isDisabled dims disabled:true rows per disabledResults; labelFor adds the check mark for checked/disabled rows. Formula (guard_results_applied -> rows_hidden_or_marked_per_results) matches the gating exactly.

    Cited code (3)

Obligations

What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.

The tests that discharge each obligation aren't available for a historical run

The evidence matrix behind each obligation comes from the live audit index, which can't be rebuilt for a past commit. Nothing here means unknown — not that the requirement has no obligations.

Formula evidence

The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).

FRETish formula

when guard_results_applied the menu_view shall eventually satisfy rows_hidden_or_marked_per_results

Witnesses· 2 scenarios total

  • menu-test.sh:1
    exercises 2 condition scenarios

MC/DC truth table· 3 rows

Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.

Covereda test exercises this rowExempteda reviewed mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test
#guard_results_appliedrows_hidden_or_marked_per_resultsResultProvesCovering test
1FFTguard_results_applied
2TFFguard_results_appliedExempted · defensive — isVisible and isDisabled consult the result maps on every row; a false guard leaving its row up needs that lookup removed (reviewed: REVIEW-M8)
3TTTrows_hidden_or_marked_per_results

Its place

How this requirement connects — what proves it, what it affects, and what it rests on. Authored links only here; automatically derived links come from the audit index.

Loading graph…

Trace evidence

The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.

No findings affect this requirement

Nothing was flagged against this requirement in the pinned run.

Impact

Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).

If you change this

Requirements
0
Files
2
Tests
1
At-risk contracts
0

Files to re-check (2)

  • Menu.qmlshell/plugins/menu/Menu.qml
  • MenuModel.jsshell/plugins/menu/MenuModel.js

Tests to re-run (1)

  • menu-test.shtest/shell.d/menu-test.sh

What this rests on

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in