Proof Portal
Omarchy
ProbeLabsviewing a historical runA proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.
An exact id match wins over every alias.
Specification
The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.
An exact id match wins over every alias. App rows are never routable, so an installed app's keywords cannot shadow a menu route (htop ships Keywords=system).
when route_input & exact_id_match the menu_router shall eventually satisfy route_is_exact_id
Rationale & tags
Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.
Rationale & tags
Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.
MenuModel.js resolveRoute lines 177-191.
Verification & provenance
How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).
Review
- Status
- in_review
- Reviewer
- Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agent
- Reviewed
- Sep 27, 2026, 21:25 UTC
History
- Created
- Sep 22, 2026, 13:33 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
- Modified
- Sep 27, 2026, 21:25 UTC · Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agent
Change history
Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.
Review history
Human and AI-agent approvals of this requirement — the 'why was this approved' lineage, each with the reviewer's justification and the code it cites.
- Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agentApprovedSpec conformanceSep 27, 2026 · 5 days agoREVIEW-58
Read resolveRoute. The exact-id check runs before the alias scan, so an exact id always wins; the alias loop skips kind==='app' entries outright, so an installed app's keywords can never shadow a menu route (the htop Keywords=system case in the description). route_input & exact_id_match models the first arm. Formula conforms to the code.
Cited code (1)
Obligations
What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.
The tests that discharge each obligation aren't available for a historical run
The evidence matrix behind each obligation comes from the live audit index, which can't be rebuilt for a past commit. Nothing here means unknown — not that the requirement has no obligations.
Formula evidence
The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).
Formula evidence
The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).
FRETish formula
when route_input & exact_id_match the menu_router shall eventually satisfy route_is_exact_id
Witnesses· 3 scenarios total
- menu-test.sh:1exercises 3 condition scenarios
MC/DC truth table· 4 rows
Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.
mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test| # | exact_id_match | route_input | route_is_exact_id | Result | Proves | Covering test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | T | F | T | exact_id_match | |
| 2 | T | F | F | T | route_input | |
| 3 | T | T | F | F | exact_id_match | Exempted · defensive — an exact id hit returns the input itself at the first check; routing it elsewhere needs that return removed (reviewed: REVIEW-M8) |
| 4 | T | T | T | T | route_is_exact_id |
Its place
How this requirement connects — what proves it, what it affects, and what it rests on. Authored links only here; automatically derived links come from the audit index.
Loading graph…
Trace evidence
The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.
No findings affect this requirement
Nothing was flagged against this requirement in the pinned run.
Impact
Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).
Impact
Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).
If you change this
Files to re-check (1)
- MenuModel.jsshell/plugins/menu/MenuModel.js
Tests to re-run (1)
- menu-test.shtest/shell.d/menu-test.sh
What this rests on
Discussions
Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.