Proof Portal

Project overview

Omarchy

ProbeLabsviewing a historical run

A proof layer — requirements, tests and verified fixes — for two of Omarchy's subsystems: the application menu (launcher scripts, QML model, JSONC config, search and selection) and the lock screen (lock scripts, QML, PAM authentication). Scope is deliberately limited to those components of omacom/omarchy; the rest of the distribution is not covered.

Viewing historical run b16f5e6Oct 2, 2026, 01:38 AMpr/10631Back to current
All requirements
RequirementSYS-REQ-260922-R8DQSystemReview

A route string (exact id, declared alias, or normalized spelling) opens the item it denotes; unknown strings fall through as literal ids.

This requirement changed after its last recorded review, so approval is stale. Automated checks pass and 1/1 obligations are satisfied.
PriorityshallTypeguaranteeCategoryfunctionalComponentmenuAssuranceCFindingsnone open

Specification

The requirement exactly as authored — its complete prose text and, where present, the formal FRETish sentence it compiles to.

Description

A route string (exact id, declared alias, or normalized spelling) opens the item it denotes; unknown strings fall through as literal ids.

FRETish formula
when route_given the menu_router shall eventually satisfy routed_to_intended_item
View full formal model

Rationale & tags

Why this requirement exists, and how it is categorised.

Routes are user-facing (omarchy menu summon power); mis-resolution opens the wrong submenu or shadows menu items behind installed apps.

Verification & provenance

How this requirement was checked: the review trail, edit history, and the machine-analysis status terms (each ⓘ explains what it means).

Assurance levelC
Formalizationvalid
Realizabilityrealizable
Vacuitychecked_ok
Strategyfretish

Review

Status
in_review
Reviewer
Kimi Zero Warnings · AI agent
Reviewed
Sep 27, 2026, 21:25 UTC

History

Created
Sep 22, 2026, 13:33 UTC · Kimi Dogfood · AI agent
Modified
Sep 30, 2026, 08:08 UTC · Leonid Bugaev

Hazard review

Reviewed Oct 1, 2026, 21:26 UTCby agent:claude-baseline-passcatalog v1.11.0
  • scenarioreviewedboundaryedge_case

    Worst case graded on the boundary obligation above (alias/exact-id shadowing across merged sources - low). boundary: the resolution partition is exact id first, then declared alias (lowercased, underscore-normalized), then normalized-spelling fallthrough, then the unknown string opened as a literal id - each arm is a child contract (exact/alias/normalized/literal), so the parent partition is covered arm by arm. edge_case: the unknown-string-as-literal-id fallthrough means a typo route opens a menu row named by the typo text instead of erroring - documented behavior, loud by row presence, and the fallback-to-root guarantee lives in the lookup child (B8N9 family). Catalog 1.11.0 re-review: input_domain not applicable, it reads no external text input. concurrency_scale not applicable, a pure function of its arguments, recomputed on each load or keystroke: no state across calls, no process, timer or lock.

  • propertyrevieweddeterminism

    determinism: the same route string answers the same item on every resolution - the precedence order is fixed by itemOrder and alias matching is a pure string comparison; no algebraic/ordering surface on a route lookup. idempotency: resolving twice cannot change the tree.

  • structuralnot applicable

    string comparisons over config-authored ids: normalization is toLowerCase + underscore-to-dash, applied uniformly before comparison (so case/separator drift is closed by construction); no memory, pointer, or encoding surface. Depth-guarded walks (32 cap) protect the tree traversal behind routing.

  • domainnot applicable

    routing is in-process string resolution: no external call, no timeout surface, no IPC, no trust boundary (routes come from the user own keybinds/scripts on their own machine). Identity classes are met by construction: route keys, item ids, and alias tokens flow through one normalization before every comparison.

Change history

Every recorded revision of this requirement's source file — newest first, each with its commit message and the diff for that change.

Obligations

What this requirement must witness to be considered satisfied — the required evidence, and the tests that discharge each one.

1 obligation · 1 discharged

Browse the catalogue

Evidence tagged via <REQ> is witnessed by a requirement that satisfies this one — normal for stakeholder / aggregate requirements, which are proven through the requirements that refine them.

Discharged

Behavior at limits, thresholds, and edge-of-range values.

If it were violatedLow

route precedence ambiguity: a user-declared alias that equals another item exact id (alias power on the item whose id is also power, or a slugified app claiming a menu id) flips which entry an alias route opens - resolution iterates itemOrder, so merged order (default-then-user, provider swaps) decides the winner; the exact-id-first partition and single-claim merge keep the wrong-target window at config-authoring time, graded low

Discharging evidence1/1 required witnessed

Formula evidence

The formal formula behind this requirement, the variables it is written over, and the tests that exercise it (each term is explained inline).

FRETish formula

when route_given the menu_router shall eventually satisfy routed_to_intended_item

Witnesses· 2 scenarios total

  • menu-test.sh:1
    exercises 2 condition scenarios

MC/DC truth table· 3 rows

Each row assigns the formula's conditions (T/F) and shows the Result— the formula's value for that input row, not a test pass/fail. A row proves a condition when flipping only that condition flips the outcome. The test that covers each row is linked.

Covereda test exercises this rowExempteda reviewed mcdc:ignoreNo-actionfalse-result row satisfied by designUncoveredneeds a covering test
#route_givenrouted_to_intended_itemResultProvesCovering test
1FFTroute_given
2TFFroute_given—
3TTTrouted_to_intended_item

Its place

How this requirement connects — what proves it, what it affects, and what it rests on. Authored links only here; automatically derived links come from the audit index.

Loading graph…

Trace evidence

The concrete artifacts linked to this requirement — implementing code, verifying tests, documents, and the findings raised against it.

No findings affect this requirement

Nothing was flagged against this requirement in the pinned run.

Impact

Blast radius — authored trace links only (automatically derived links come from the audit index and aren't shown here).

If you change this

Requirements
6
Files
2
Tests
2
At-risk contracts
0

What this rests on

Discussions

Discuss this with the proof team. Nothing changes in your audit automatically — you open a request and a staff member records any outcome inside the thread.

Sign in to discuss this with the proof team.Sign in