lint-prose-ste100: 87 issue(s)

lint-hazard-review-current: 3 issue(s)

lint-exemplar-missing-on-new: 56 advisory notice(s)

lint-hazard-consequence: 80 advisory notice(s)

lint-ki-banned-markers: 1 advisory notice(s)

disabled by project.checks policy

disabled by project.checks policy

disabled by project.checks policy

0 ambiguous pairs (1980 pairs checked)

all referenced requirement IDs and obligation annotations match current spec files

0 autolink errors

142 untraced function(s): 142 owned by orphan_code_clean, 0 owned by orphan_tests_clean, 0 unowned — this roll-up adds no finding of its own; fix them under their owning check

all 81 requirements passed quality checks

lint-ac-inverse-coverage: no issues found

lint-ac-subset-of-satisfies: no issues found

lint-acceptance-review-current: no issues found

lint-annotation-vs-authored: no issues found

lint-assumption-disposition: no issues found

lint-audit-ignore-reason: no issues found

lint-auto-modifier-without-human: no issues found

lint-circularity-self-citation: no issues found

lint-complementary-flags-uninteracted: no issues found

lint-data-constraint-parseable: no issues found

lint-decomposition-adds-refinement: no issues found

lint-degenerate-input-obligation-missing: no issues found

lint-evidence-tag-exists: no issues found

lint-formalization-quality: no issues found

lint-fretish-bare-response: no issues found

lint-fretish-tautology: no issues found

lint-governance-yaml-data-paths: no issues found

lint-hallucinated-symbols: no issues found

lint-id-shape-canonical: no issues found

lint-inline-impact-review-drift: no issues found

lint-ki-attacker-coherence: no issues found

lint-ki-history-chronology: no issues found

lint-ki-open-actionability: no issues found

lint-ki-prose-shape: no issues found

lint-ki-stale-status-refs: no issues found

lint-numbering-gaps-has-tombstone: no issues found

lint-obligation-checklist-empty: no issues found

lint-obligation-coverage-gap: no issues found

lint-operational-invariant-var: no issues found

lint-parent-field-vs-satisfies: no issues found

lint-pinned-delimiter-undispositioned: no issues found

lint-plan-of-record-current: no issues found

lint-reject-combination-composition-witnessed: no issues found

lint-req-type-vs-description: no issues found

lint-review-cadence-current: no issues found

lint-satisfies-target-retired: no issues found

lint-shared-state-rebuild: no issues found

lint-source-doc-hedging: no issues found

lint-source-native-yaml-trace: no issues found

lint-spec-conformance-review-grounded: no issues found

lint-status-vs-review: no issues found

lint-sw-informal-witnessed: no issues found

lint-threat-surface-present: no issues found

lint-trace-review-evidence-current: no issues found

lint-unjoined-effect-halves: no issues found

lint-yaml-escape-artefact: no issues found

30 obligation(s) on 23 requirement(s) covered by satisfying children, 1 deferred (tracked) — deferred obligations are tracked debt, not a pass

42 covered, 1 deferred (tracked) — deferred obligations are tracked debt, not a pass

no in-branch changed files to gate for change evidence

evidence diversity policy disabled

no :fuzz annotations in scope

no active high/critical-severity or security-relevant (cve_surface possible/likely/confirmed) known issue requires a reproducer-grade gate

no active integration requirements to witness

no mirrors declared (declare one with `proof mirror add` when starting a refactor/port)

0 security-classed requirement(s) carry a negative-path witness

0 requirement(s) have all 0 baseline obligation(s) resolved

2 stakeholder obligation checklist(s) fully covered

no obligation_delegations declared

all 30 cataloged obligation checklist item(s) have signal-rule or evidence backing

no evidence profiles configured

all 5 obligation suppression rationale(s) meet the 32-char minimum

no obligation suppressions at or above reviewer-required severity

32 witness(es): 0 grounded (static), 0 cleared (coverage), 0 exempt; 8 witness(es) coverage-unavailable (advisory)

no input data-constraint partitions require runtime evidence

1 mitigated report(s) all carry class-mitigation evidence

no requirements carry a verification_strategy

4 of 4 components with >=2 formalized guarantees have zero checkable consistency pairs and no recorded justification (0 attested)

1 proof complexity budget overruns across 1 components

193 suspect links

2 requirement/family finding(s) likely under-modeled relative to current tests or implementation

12 variable model issues (12 declared-unused, 0 undeclared-used)

public command surfaces have aligned requirement/help/test coverage

no variables with Z3-backed properties or constraints to check

no variables with Z3-backed properties or constraints to verify

no SYS-REQ claims formalization_status=valid with a LEMMA: trace or verifies: annotation

no configured cross-component specs require FRETish formalization

no non-bool input/mode variables across 3 formalized components — every modeled input is a boolean. If any component handles quantitative values (sizes, timeouts, costs, status codes, rates), declaring them as range:/data_constraint variables unlocks Z3 verification, boundary testing, and partition evidence. See: proof help domain-modeling

all 16 review or approved guarantee requirement(s) in 1 configured lower formal-layer spec(s) have a non-envelope FRETish formalization

0 slow solver-backed components over 1m0s

no modeling opportunities: 79 formalized requirements evaluated, 3 carried enumerable-domain signals, all with modeled or waived domains (0 waived, 0 with recorded reasons, 3 suppressed by bool-only gate). See: proof help domain-modeling

all 14 SYS-REQs formalized in FRETish

0 vacuity findings across 79 eligible requirements

4 formalized components passed solver preflight

no comparable parent-child data-constraint partitions

no variables with Z3-backed properties or constraints to verify

verify: 0 failing steps, 2 warning steps

0 reqproof:lemma annotations in project — coverage not applicable until lemmas are authored

slow-test audit enabled but test-results artifact is not configured

for f in bin/omarchy-apply-lock bin/omarchy-system-lock bin/omarchy-update-lock bin/omarchy-hyprland-session-locked bin/omarchy-system-sleep-lock bin/omarchy-menu bin/omarchy-menu-select bin/omarchy-menu-input bin/omarchy-menu-plugin bin/omarchy-menu-share bin/omarchy-menu-timezone bin/omarchy-menu-file bin/omarchy-menu-emoji-insert; do /usr/bin/bash -n "$f" || exit 1; done; node --check shell/plugins/menu/MenuModel.js (ok)

code-level MC/DC meets configured thresholds (aggregate decisions 41.4%, conditions 45.3%, 28 incomplete functions) (10 ignored decisions)

code-level MC/DC evidence available for: bash, js

no requirements with coverage data to check

no components declare fixture-backed evidence -- fixture staleness not applicable

no components declare fixture-backed evidence -- FLIP fixtures not applicable

no components declare fixture-backed evidence -- FLIP test alignment not applicable

79 requirements checked, 295 witness rows total, 0 uncovered

all 10 code-level //mcdc:ignore annotation(s) are classified; capability-gap ignores reference an open KnownIssue with a failing tripwire; honored witness-row exemptions are categorized

no KI-gated MC/DC or obligation disposition has outlived its fixed bug

mcdc verifies witness enforcement disabled

all MC/DC witness tests reference product code and configured outcome-variable code

no components declare fixture-backed evidence -- property fixtures not applicable

all tests passed

85/85 valid

14/14 verification chains complete

declared scope covers all 27 declared production source file(s)

81 requirement(s) evaluated — all agree with the derived proposal

6 unconstrained outputs

2 interface coverage gaps (2 components without interfaces, 0 interfaces without reqs, 0 broken references)

142 code functions have no requirement annotation

0 circular dependencies

0 cross-component reqs fully covered

100% cross-level coverage (2/2)

0 cross-spec contradictions (0 pairs checked)

no baseline available, skipping

0 duplicate interface contracts

0 interface contracts checked, 0 stale

all 3 spec levels connected (L0:2, L1:14, L2:65)

35 test functions scanned, 0 orphans

no retired/superseded requirements

all role references resolve (47 built-in + 0 project-local role(s) checked)

14/14 linked to stakeholder reqs

1 of 1 active known issue(s) below the quality floor (1 stale/invalid evidence; 1 total gap(s)) — see `proof help known_issue_complete` (full per-category breakdown in the check metadata / --format json)

disabled by project.checks policy

no known issue declares `platforms:` (platform-bound closure check opt-in)

no build_targets declared (platform coverage check opt-in)

disabled by project.checks policy

no active accepted risks

all 0 approved requirement(s) carry valid motivation (or are initial-creation exemptions)

approval policy disabled

no active assumptions

all traced production implementation files have current no-authored-change reviews

no semantic-scan artifact

all 1 affects: entries land in a matching verification.review.motivation

changed requirement review skipped (no git diff context)

0/0 decompositions complete; 14 parent(s) state their own verified claim and are refined, not decomposed

no changed requirements in current branch

no active known issues carry a `private` or under-embargo disclosure

documentation.enforce_sources not configured (check disabled)

1 active known issue(s) name the requirement(s) they violate (or carry a reviewer-stamped requirement_exemption)

0 active known issue(s) with a declared mirror anchor have affected_requirements that fall inside that mirror's scope (or resolve to no scope / are waived)

0 high/critical known issue(s) with a poc_quality block satisfy every applicable rule (or carry a reviewer-stamped poc_quality_exemption)

no known issues are overdue for upstream re-check

1 active known issue(s) with a bound reproducer assert the secure contract or declare a characterization (no reproducer contradicts its finding)

1 active known issue(s) carry a runnable reproducer (a resolving test selector, a runnable command, or a `// Reproduces:` annotation) or a reviewer-stamped poc_presence_exemption

0 security-relevant known issue(s) document a remediation or mitigation (or carry a reviewer-stamped remediation_exemption)

0 known issue(s) with a prose severity grade match their structured severity field (or carry a reviewer-stamped severity_bound)

1 known issue(s); none fixed with template_class, kill_domain, or isomorphic_sites to checklist

1 open known issue(s) meet template-transfer hygiene

1 active known issue(s) visible (review interval 90 day(s))

1 problem report(s) reviewed; all dispositioned

no untrusted-input dataflows into trusted outputs: 79 formalized requirements evaluated, 0 in safety/financial scope, all sourced from trusted or sanitized data (0 waived, 0 with recorded reasons)

no active waivers

3 testable acceptance criteria across 2 stakeholder req(s) witnessed (0 via direct acceptance test, 3 deferred (tracked)) — deferred ACs are tracked debt, not a pass

2 unmodeled code predicate site(s) across 65 implemented FRETish requirement(s)

1 of 1 in-scope known issue(s) (at or above medium severity, or being submitted) have PoC quality gaps (1 missing block, 0 failed rule(s)). ACC-15.

process_checklist: incomplete onboard_v1 (14 pending, 3 not-applicable (new-project onboarding and adoption-gated steps auto-skipped)) — next: traces-light — Light code↔spec graph (Implements/Documents) (role: onboard) — run: proof checklist show onboard_v1 (proof help process-checklists)

17 function(s) pending property-based test evaluation

surface_coverage: 1 GAP / 0 dual-surface-GAP / 0 dual-surface-residual of 1 surface(s) (ok=0 debt=0) — recommended: proof role show surface-close --format agent (then re-audit); proof help surface_coverage

3 no-stamp, 11 stale, 1/15 specs: claim-reviewed, 0 verified, 0 promoted, 0 dismissed

no build_targets declared (build matrix check opt-in)

disabled by project.checks policy

no documented_behaviors declared (documented claim evidence check opt-in)

no dual-path rules declared in proof/dual-path-rules/ or project.dual_path_rules (dual-path guard check opt-in)

disabled by project.checks policy

no :acceptance tags share a test carrier with a derived SYS/SW/INT witness

no approved guarantee conflicts with an unacknowledged open known issue

no variables with Z3-backed properties or constraints to verify

no concerns directory (concern adjudication no-op)

100% coverage (22/22)

0 CVSS-carrying known issue(s) label at or above their own vector band (or carry a reviewer-stamped severity_bound)

project is not Web3/DeFi — deployment_tvl_verified skipped (enable via checks.deployment_tvl_verified.enabled: true)

no differential fixtures under proof/fixtures/ (author one with schema proof.fixtures/v1)

no approved requirement is witnessed only by a failing or skipped test

no high/critical ObligationHazards on active requirements

no mirrors declared (declare one with `proof mirror add` when starting a refactor/port)

1 residual(s) pass kill hygiene

no empty-is-win or finding-quota language in 47 role(s)

0 security-named known issue(s) carry a CVSS vector + non-none cve_surface (or a reviewer-stamped security_relevance_justification)

no active known issue has been reported externally (submission / upstream_report block) or marked for submission (disposition)

14 SYS-REQ(s) have a downward realization (SW-REQ child, implementing code, or verifying tests)

3 configured test command(s) propagate their real failure exit code

1 vector(s); no P0 unresearched campaigns

1 requirement(s) have a variables: list consistent with their FRETish

1 vector(s) satisfy campaign closure (1 terminal; 0 evidence-bound; 0 KI-owned; 0 deferred-by-config)

1 vector(s) pass campaign hygiene

disabled by project.checks policy

no proof/signals directory (deadline-cast signal hunt no-op)

4 code signal(s) across 4 source artifact(s); explicit signal obligations covered or explicitly resolved

no project signal suppressions declared

4 code signal(s) across 4 source artifact(s); no proposes_class declarations are unbindable

catalog/obligation/signal/requirement set is internally consistent (18 obligation_class(es) declared, 325 catalog class(es) loaded)

catalog version 1.10.1 in use; no pin configured (set project.catalog.version in proof.yaml for auditor-stable upgrades)

2 STK-REQs fully structured (persona, story, acceptance criteria with derived_reqs)

14 SYS-REQs fully linked and described

65 SW/INT-REQs fully linked to SYS-REQs

SRS generates successfully

all requirements checked

2 stakeholder reqs all have acceptance criteria with derived_reqs

2 stakeholder requirements found

no decision tables declared (domain.tables in <component>.vars.yaml); nothing to check. If any component has lookup-table or enum*action behavior (permission matrices, per-role/per-state surfaces, status transitions), declaring it under domain.tables enables completeness/consistency/equivalence checking. See: proof help domain-modeling

no decision tables declared (domain.tables in <component>.vars.yaml); nothing to check. If any component has lookup-table or enum*action behavior (permission matrices, per-role/per-state surfaces, status transitions), declaring it under domain.tables enables completeness/consistency/equivalence checking. See: proof help domain-modeling

no decision tables declared (domain.tables in <component>.vars.yaml); nothing to check. If any component has lookup-table or enum*action behavior (permission matrices, per-role/per-state surfaces, status transitions), declaring it under domain.tables enables completeness/consistency/equivalence checking. See: proof help domain-modeling